17 Feb Canon EOS RP
- 26.2 megapixel
- Full frame CMOS sensor
- Adapter allows for using EF lenses
- Phase detect AF
- 4,799 selectable AF Points
- 4 fps with continuous AF (AI Servo)
- ISO Sensitivity of 100-40000
- No in body stabilization
- Different battery
- One SD Slot
- 4k video capabilities
- Battery life of 270 shots (EVF)
- $1,699 CAD
Canon just announced another camera in their full-frame mirrorless line-up, the EOS RP. This is a lower priced mirrorless camera, aimed towards those photographers that are looking to step up to a full frame camera, without the price tag of the EOS R, or 5D Mark IV. The camera comes with a full frame 26.2 megapixel CMOS sensor with phase detect autofocus and 4k video, at a very reasonable price tag of $1,699 CAD.
So what’s the biggest difference between the EOS RP and EOS R, or why not go with one of the traditional full-frame entry level Canon DSLR’s, like the 6D Mark II. See below for what I think are some of the biggest differences:
The biggest difference between the two are the price tag. The EOS RP comes in at $1,699 CAD, compared to $2,999 CAD for the EOS R.
With the lower price tag, comes a little less in terms of performance of the EOR RP compared to the EOS R. The camera comes with a 26.2 megapixle, slightly less than the 30.3 megapixels of the EOS R. It comes with the robust autofocus phase-detection system that was introduced with the EOS R, and 4,799 selectable autofocus points. The camera also comes wth a lower frames per second, it’s 4 when using AI Servo autofocus, compared to the 5 with the EOS R.
A few other things that I noticed when reviewing the camera specs is that the battery life is less than half of that of the EOS R, and only advertised to be 270 shots. So while the camera is lighter, the lightest full-frame Canon camera, weighing just over one pound, but this weight savings might be offset by all the extra weight of carrying batteries around with you. Another thing that I saw that would be slightly annoying for people with other Canon cameras (7d mark II, 5D mark III, etc) is that it uses a different battery, whereas the EOS R uses the same battery as those other cameras, so eliminates the need for an extra charger, and different kind of batteries.
In comparison to the 6D Mark II, the DSLR entry level full-frame camera, the EOS RP comes in at the same number of megapixels and less frames per second. The EPS RP weighs less than the 6D Mark II, with the 6D Mark II weighing 1.51 lbs versus 1.07 lbs, and it is smaller overall. Best of all the the EOS RP is less expensive, with the 6D Mark II coming in at $1,999 CAD. So it really makes me wondering why you would pay more for the 6D Mark II.
The following tables shows a comparison of the three camera bodies:
Specification EOS RP EOS R 6D Mark II
Megapixels 26.2 30.3 26.2
AF Points 4,799 5,655 45
Frames per second* 4 5 5
ISO Range 100-40000 100-40000 100-40000
Battery Life (shots)** 270 560 1,200
Price (CAD) $1,699 $2,999 $1,999
*Frames per second for the mirrorless is bases on being in AI Servo AF.
**Battery life on mirrorless is based on room temperature and eco/power savings modes enabled
If you are in the market for a new full frame entry level camera, the EOS RP seems like it will be a nice place to start.
If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch with me at firstname.lastname@example.org.